Hi,

Please keep in mind that even if MRT and ARC are both using the 
"ear-decomposition", they are using it in a different way. Some merging/common 
work may be possible, but I don't feel the common points too strong now. Maybe 
we should speak about this in Vancouver.

Gabor

-----Original Message-----
From: rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
IJsbrand Wijnands
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 12:31 PM
To: Alvaro Retana
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Adoption of MRT Algorithms Draft 
(draft-enyedi-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm)

Dear WG,

>From a multicast POV I support this work to be adopted. Being able to build 
>two non-intersection paths through a single plane network is very useful for 
>Multicast live-live and MoFRR deployments. It solves a real problem which we 
>see in today's networks.

A more challenging question to answer is how 
draft-enyedi-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm relates to draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-00 and 
draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-bicast-00. I don't know if both can move forward 
individually or if some merge is possible. It would be good if the authors get 
together and discuss this.

Thx,

Ice.

On 27 Sep 2013, at 14:53, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aret...@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> This message starts a two-week Call for WG Adoption for 'Algorithms for 
> computing Maximally Redundant Trees for IP/LDP Fast-Reroute' 
> (draft-enyedi-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm).
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-enyedi-rtgwg-mrt-frr-algorithm
> 
> At the meeting in Berlin the authors asked for the WG adoption of their 
> draft, but here were very few people in the room who had actually reviewed 
> the document to get any type of read of the room.  
> 
> We want to hear from people who have read and understood the draft (besides 
> the authors!) about this topic.  Please provide some explanation as to why 
> you support or not the adoption of the draft - avoid "+1".
> 
> This call will be over by EOD on Oct/11, 2013 (pick your favorite time zone).
> 
> Thanks!!
> 
> Alvaro.
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to