As you may recall, we successfully completed a WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-10. After that, there was concern about the use of ITU terminology (composite-link and NPO) where the draft was not actually using the exact meaning specified by the ITU.
Therefore, it was decided to return the draft to the WG for a quick terminology update (and also to address some other review comments). The changes in draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-requirement-11 are largely terminology and clarifications; FR#1 appears to have been broken up into two separate requirements. Since neither Curtis nor Lou Berger can make our Friday rtgwg slot, I'd strongly encourage conversation here on the list to review and comment on the updated draft. I'd like to get it in for WG last call shortly after IETF - and see the other related work move along as well. Reviews are critical to complete this Advanced Multipath work in a reasonable timeframe (well, starting from now - reasonable was passed a while ago). Thanks, Alia
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
