The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6571, "Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Applicability in Service Provider (SP) Networks".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6571&eid=3561 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Ciril Rozic <ro...@hawaii.edu> Section: 3.1.1.1 Original Text ------------- The LFA to P is via C2, because c < d + u. It is node-protecting if eq2: x + e < x + c, i.e., if e < c. Corrected Text -------------- The LFA to P is via C2 if x + e < d + u + x. It is node-protecting if eq2: x + e < c + x, i.e., if e < c. Notes ----- The condition for the first sentence e < d + u is not stated in the assumptions in Section 3. The second sentence is not incorrect, but "c + x" is more consistent with eq1 in Section 2. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6571 (draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Applicability in Service Provider (SP) Networks Publication Date : June 2012 Author(s) : C. Filsfils, Ed., P. Francois, Ed., M. Shand, B. Decraene, J. Uttaro, N. Leymann, M. Horneffer Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Routing Area Working Group Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
