RTGWG,

We are in a poll on "Composite Link Framework in Multi Protocol Label
Switching (MPLS)", aka the CL Framework (currently
draft-so-yong-rtgwg-cl-framework-05, would be updated to -06).

Are there any objections from the WG to updating the CL framework from
the current -05 version to an -06 version to reflect the discussion on
the WG mailing list and making those updates during the poll?  

BTW- Primary participants in the WG mailing list discussion were
Iftekhar Hussain, Lucy Yong, and myself.  Kireeti Kompella made
comments in response to Iftekhar, but regarding requirements implied
by the CL Framework.

Curtis
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to