My mistake. CL requirements is at -06. CL framework is -05. In message <201206132351.q5dnpfer089...@gateway.ipv6.occnc.com> Curtis Villamizar writes:
btw- current version is -06. In message <cag4d1rf6x2u55iddngk4hwd-ozbrpexmyh4hyl9r-ao6tgo...@mail.gmail.com> Alia Atlas writes: This email is to start a poll and discussion on whether to adopt draft-so-yong-rtgwg-cl-framework-05 as an RTGWG draft. Please respond with opinions, comments, and whether you have read the draft. Last IETF, there were very few people who had read the draft. Authors, please indicate if there is any IPR associated with this draft. Thanks, Alia _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list rtgwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
