In message <cag4d1re2my6-tiapwfp_qymdp7+umefapkhafzodxhk6aos...@mail.gmail.com> Alia Atlas writes: > This is to start a poll and discussion about whether RTGWG should adopt > draft-symmvo-rtgwg-cl-use-cases-00 as a WG draft. > > Please respond with comments and reasoning and if you have read the draft. > At our last meeting, very few people indicated that they had read the draft. > > Authors, please indicate in email whether there is any IPR associated > with the draft. > > Thanks, > Alia > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
Alia, I know of no IPR that is associated with this draft. [Co-authors please speak up regarding IPR as well]. btw- support. :-) ... and I did read it. reason for support: contains background information that was pulled from CL requirements and CL framework that is useful to have in an informational document. It is referenced by CL requirements and CL framework to add clarity to CL requirements and CL framework without pulling the entire discussion into those two documents. WG mailing list discussion of the contents would be appreciated by the authors. Note: no pending changes to this document except author affiliations, downcasing a letter in the title: "USe Cases" changes to "Use Cases", and similar one paragraph addition to the acknowledgements as in CL requirements acknowledgements. Curtis _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
