Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers-24: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Alan DeKok, Mahesh, Sonal, Ashesh, and Jeff,

Thanks also to Yingzhen Qu for an OPSDIR review of an early version and to the
authors for the follow-up.

# DISCUSS

I don’t understand the need for the YANG module as these identities are also
defined in draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authentication.

Any reason why this is defined?

Cheers,
Med





Reply via email to