Ok. Will add it as part of next update. > On Jan 31, 2024, at 5:38 PM, Rahman <reshad=40yahoo....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > My only comment is we should be explicit about the action taken when we > detect that the session has been compromised (no F received). > > Regards, > Reshad. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 31, 2024, at 11:06 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jh...@pfrc.org> wrote: >> >> Reshad, >> >>> On Jan 30, 2024, at 12:28 AM, Rahman <res...@yahoo.com >>> <mailto:res...@yahoo.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Jeff, good catch. >>> >>> We can document both ways, ie we can let implementations decide which of >>> the 2 methods below they prefer? Or is the concern that this will cause a >>> DISCUSS? >> >> Mahesh has proposed the fix for the next rev in this pull request: >> >> https://github.com/bfd-wg/optimized-auth/pull/19/files >> <https://github.com/bfd-wg/optimized-auth/pull/19/files> >> >> -- Jeff >>
Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com
