> On Oct 19, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Reshad Rahman <[email protected]> wrote: > > As Mahesh has replied, we can't do this as an erratum. Doing a new document > with a module which augments ietf-bfd-lag would be the easiest solution, but > I don't think it's the way to go. A bis of 9314 is more appropriate.
Maybe we should just bis the BFD YANG spec once per IETF. :-P —John P.S.: I’m joking.
