Same view here, I believe the draft is ready to progress. 
Thanks!

Cheers,
Jeff

> On Aug 8, 2021, at 01:08, Gyan Mishra <hayabusa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear MPLS WG chairs,
> 
> I believe this draft has matured and is clearly written and coherent and a 
> very helpful for operators to have this bidirectional return path feature to 
> enable BFD  co-routed paths for deterministic failure detection on localized 
> paths for facilitate integrity testing.
> 
> This feature is highly valuable to operators for in band facility integrity 
> validation with BFD session using a bi-directional co-routed path.
> 
> All technical comments have been addressed in the early RTGDIR review and the 
> draft has been updated to reflect the comments.
> 
> I believe  this draft is now ready to progress to WGLC.
> 
> Kind Regards 
> 
> Gyan 
> 
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:47 PM <gregory.mir...@ztetx.com> wrote:
>> Dear MPLS WG Chairs et al.,
>> 
>> We addressed all the technical comments from the early RtgDir review, 
>> comments from Jeff Haas, added the Implementation Status section. The 
>> authors of draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed are seeking your suggestions, advice 
>> on the next steps that would lead to the WG LC on the draft. The document is 
>> stable and, in the authors' opinion, is ready for the WG LC.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Greg Mirsky
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sr. Standardization Expert
>> 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D 
>> Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> <9ae3e214c17d49ed935d87c674ba3ee2.jpg>
>> <24242e5637af428891c4db731e7765ad.jpg>
>> 
>> E: gregory.mir...@ztetx.com 
>> www.zte.com.cn
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> m...@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> -- 
> 
> 
> Gyan Mishra
> Network Solutions Architect 
> Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com
> M 301 502-1347
> 
> 

Reply via email to