Hi Jeff, I have read the draft, it's useful draft. I support the adoption.
Best regards, Mach > -----Original Message----- > From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas > Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 9:16 PM > To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org > Subject: Adoption call for draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 16 August, > 2020) > > Working Group, > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo/ > > At the virtual IETF 108, Unaffiliated BFD Echo Function was presented. This > is a followup of a presentation given at IETF 106. > > The authors have indicated they would like to have this work adopted by the > BFD WG. This begins the adoption call ending August 16. Please respond > to the mailing list with your thoughts on this adoption. > > It should be noted that this document overlaps work in the Broadband > Forum > (BBF) document TR-146. As noted in the presentation, the BBF document > lacks some clarity and also doesn't discuss interactions with BFD > implementations. > This draft has good clarifications with regard to implementations of this > mechanism when the a BFD Echo-capable implementation is used. > > This raises two points to consider as part of adoption: > - This document with its current goals would Update RFC 5880. > - The status of this document would need to be Proposed Standard. > > -- Jeff
