Hi Mirja and Olivier, I apologize that some of Olivier's comments were not addressed. I've responded to Olivier's detailed comments in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/?q=Tsvart%20last%20call. I much appreciate your help in identifying the remaining questions and comments.
Regards, Greg On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:22 AM Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-09: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > UPDATE: I didn't not see a reply to the original issue raised by the > TSV-ART > review (Thanks Olivier!). Please have a lock and provide a response. I > don't > think this raises discuss level but I think some clarifications would be > good! > > This document describes the use of BFD in VXLAN, however, it does not > specify > any new protocol elements or extension. Therefore I would expect such a > document to be informational. The shepherd write-up doesn't give any > additional > information about why this doc is PS. > > >
