Carlo,s

> On Sep 13, 2019, at 11:48 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) 
> <cpign...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Right. Or a burst of large packets and a set of bursts of “regular sized” 
> ones. My main point is that I’d like the spec to allow for flexibility in 
> usage if you think it makes sense, and not be all-or-nothing. 

No matter what, you'd have to accommodate for the timers.

If your timers will accommodate small and large within the same interval, go 
for it. If you need to renegotiate to do a periodic check, go for it.  BFD is 
permissive about such things. :-)

Even better, suggest text that makes you think such a thing is explicitly 
permitted rather than implicitly permitted.  I treat this as simply varying 
bfd.PaddedPduSize on an established session.  

-- Jeff

Reply via email to