+1. Support publication as this is useful and technically sound.

I do not understand why  [I-D.ietf-bfd-multipoint] is a Normative reference, or 
frankly a reference at all. I do not think there’s a need to reference every 
potential thin outside scope.

Thanks,

— Carlos Pignataro

On Oct 22, 2018, at 9:56 AM, Donald Eastlake 
<d3e...@gmail.com<mailto:d3e...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I support publication of this draft. It is a useful OAM building block.

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 1424 Pro Shop Court, Davenport, FL 33896 USA
 d3e...@gmail.com<mailto:d3e...@gmail.com>


On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:14 PM Jeffrey Haas 
<jh...@pfrc.org<mailto:jh...@pfrc.org>> wrote:
Working Group,

This starts the Working Group Last Call for BFD for VxLAN.  This last call
ends the Friday after IETF, November 9.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan/

Please comment whether you believe this document is ready to advance or not..

There is currently one IPR statement on this draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3193/

Authors, please publicly state to the mailing list whether you know of any
additional IPR that impacts this draft.

-- Jeff & Reshad



----- Forwarded message from Greg Mirsky 
<gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>> -----

Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 07:47:19 -0700
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>>
To: rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org<mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>>, Marc Binderberger 
<m...@sniff.de<mailto:m...@sniff.de>>
Cc: bfd-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bfd-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan-03.txt

Dear All,
the new version is to address comments from Marc (big thank you, Marc).
Please note that IDNits err on downref to the normative reference
to Informational RFC 7348.

Regards,
Greg


Reply via email to