Acee, Or by doing a "bis" version of the draft. There is no way to augment a typedef.
Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com > On Apr 2, 2018, at 5:08 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Mahesh – I believe these should be done as augmentations since > draft-ietf-bfd-yang-13 has already been submitted to the IESG for publication. > Thanks, > Acee > > From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani > <mjethanand...@gmail.com> > Date: Monday, April 2, 2018 at 12:06 AM > To: Ashesh Mishra <mishra.ash...@gmail.com> > Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>, > "draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authenticat...@ietf.org" > <draft-ietf-bfd-optimizing-authenticat...@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: Comments on Optimizing BFD Authentication > > > > > On Apr 1, 2018, at 8:40 AM, Ashesh Mishra <mishra.ash...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > What are the yang model considerations? (See prior point.) > > [AM] I'll let Mahesh comment on this. > > To support the optimized BFD authentication, we will need to change the BFD > YANG model to add a ‘optimized’ authentication capability. > > Following are some of the changes I anticipate > > - The current model has a typedef for auth-type, but since a bit has not been > assigned (it is a TBD), it will require an update to the typedef to include > the new bit, when it is assigned after IANA approves it. > > - The current YANG model only supports the meticulous mode of authentication > in its grouping for auth-parms. Will need to make it a choice between > meticulous and the ‘optimized’ mode. > > > Mahesh Jethanandani > mjethanand...@gmail.com > >
