Joe,
Thank for you your quick answer!

I’ll take ticket #2985 as an example, which is one of those affected by the 
issue.

The scrip correctly happens in the transaction #38624, “Status changed from 
'new' to 'resolved'”, as the (custom) scrip condition is (taken from the DB):

| 17 | On closure                 | If the status is set to inactive            
                                             | StatusChange            | old: 
initial, active; new: inactive | Status                                   |     
  1 | 2012-05-30 15:54:19 |             1 | 2012-05-30 15:54:19 |

Here is some output from rt.log:

[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: About to think about scrips for transaction 
#38624 (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Transaction.pm:173)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: About to prepare scrips for transaction 
#38624 (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Transaction.pm:177)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Found 15 scrips for TransactionCreate stage 
with applicable type(s) Status for txn #38624 on ticket #2985 
(/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:367)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #19 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #35 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #18 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #12 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #2 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #21 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #27 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #23 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #29 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #37 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Skipping Scrip #38 because it isn't 
applicable (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:229)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: About to commit scrips for transaction 
#38624 (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Transaction.pm:197)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Committing scrip #34 on txn #38624 of 
ticket #2985 (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:183)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [info]: Attempting to auto assign ticket #2985 to 
user #3444 ((eval 3201):12)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Committing scrip #10 on txn #38624 of 
ticket #2985 (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Scrips.pm:183)
[Mon Sep 10 13:24:00 2012] [debug]: Calling SetRecipientDigests for transaction 
RT::Transaction=HASH(0xe6582b0), id 38624 
(/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Action/SendEmail.pm:6

Attached you can find two queries I’ve just executed in my DB. It shows that 
the owner is correctly set as the id of the user John Doe.


Ø  And the chart looks for the resolved transaction to get owner at the time of 
resolution?
I don’t think it’s a matter of transactions, as I think the chart queries 
tickets, not transactions.








Alberto Scotto

Blue Reply
Via Cardinal Massaia, 83
10147 - Torino - ITALY
phone: +39 011 29100
[email protected]
www.reply.it

[Blue Reply]

From: Joe Harris [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: giovedì 4 ottobre 2012 13:37
To: Scotto Alberto
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Setting owner with _Set breaks queries (may be a bug)

This is a shot in the dark and I may be way off, but is there a chance your 
scrip to set the owner runs in a transaction that happens after the transaction 
that resolves the ticket?

And the chart looks for the resolved transaction to get owner at the time of 
resolution?

Just a thought.
Sent from my mobile device.

On Oct 4, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Scotto Alberto 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all,
I think I found a bug.
I have a scrip called "On closure Auto set owner", which sets the owner while 
closing the ticket in case nobody has never taken it, so that I don't get 
resolved tickets assigned to "Nobody in particular".
Everything seemed ok until today a colleague of mine noticed something weird 
with a chart that acts like a hall of fame, showing the top Owners. This chart 
is very simple: it retrieves all the tickets and it is grouped by 
Owner.RealName.
The weird thing is not the chart itself, but the fact that the following two 
queries should return the same tickets but they don’t:

-          Owner.RealName = 'Nobody in particular' returns 706 tickets

-          Owner = 'Nobody in particular' returns 369 tickets
The results of the former are not correct: it includes also the tickets for 
which the owner was set by my scrip, though the column “Owner” is correct 
(filled with “John Doe”, not “Nobody in particular”).

Here are the relevant lines of the code of my scrip:

# get actor ID
my $Actor = $self->TransactionObj->Creator;
my $tkt = $self->TicketObj;
# try to change owner
my ($status, $msg) = $tkt->_Set(Field => 'Owner', Value => $Actor, 
RecordTransaction => 0);

I solved the problem using SetOwner instead of _Set, like this:

my ($status, $msg) = $tkt->SetOwner($Actor);

With the new code, the tickets whose owner is set by my scrip don’t get caught 
by the query Owner.RealName = 'Nobody in particular'.

Looks like _Set doesn’t update correctly some field in some table in the DB. 
But I have no idea of what field and what table! I had a quick look at the DB, 
and it seems that the relation ticket-owner is based on an user ID, not a 
string (the real name).

Finally, a weird thing with the chart: on the right side, it displays all the 
owners and the number of tickets associated. For “Nobody in particular”, the 
number is 369 (correct); but if I click on this number it generates the query 
“Owner.RealName = 'Nobody in particular'” saying “Found 706 tickets”.

The questions are:
Should I file a bug?
How can I “convert” the tickets that were processed with the old code?

Hope everything is clear

Thank you very much!


Alberto Scotto

Blue Reply
Via Cardinal Massaia, 83
10147 - Torino - ITALY
phone: +39 011 29100
[email protected]
www.reply.it

<blue.png>


________________________________

--
The information transmitted is intended for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in 
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from any computer.

--------
Final RT training for 2012 in Atlanta, GA - October 23 & 24
 http://bestpractical.com/training

We're hiring! http://bestpractical.com/jobs

________________________________

--
The information transmitted is intended for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in 
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
sender and delete the material from any computer.

<<inline: blue.png>>

Title: DbVisualizer export output

select from Tickets

Date: 2012-10-04 14:59:32
Rows: 1
Columns: 25
SQL Statement:
SELECT *
FROM
    Tickets t
where t.id=2985

id EffectiveId Queue Type IssueStatement Resolution Owner Subject InitialPriority FinalPriority Priority TimeEstimated TimeWorked Status TimeLeft Told Starts Started Due Resolved LastUpdatedBy LastUpdated Creator Created Disabled
2985 2985 46 ticket 0 0 3444 Richiesta entry CNAME per nuove licenze FEV 0 0 0 0 0 resolved 0 (null) 1970-01-01 00:00:00 2012-09-10 13:24:00 1970-01-01 00:00:00 2012-09-10 13:24:00 3444 2012-09-10 13:24:00 11821 2012-09-10 10:31:00 0

Select - Tickets join Users

Date: 2012-10-04 14:56:50
Rows: 1
Columns: 60
SQL Statement:
SELECT *
FROM
    Tickets t join Users u on u.id=t.Owner
where t.id=2985

id EffectiveId Queue Type IssueStatement Resolution Owner Subject InitialPriority FinalPriority Priority TimeEstimated TimeWorked Status TimeLeft Told Starts Started Due Resolved LastUpdatedBy LastUpdated Creator Created Disabled id Name Password AuthToken Comments Signature EmailAddress FreeformContactInfo Organization RealName NickName Lang EmailEncoding WebEncoding ExternalContactInfoId ContactInfoSystem ExternalAuthId AuthSystem Gecos HomePhone WorkPhone MobilePhone PagerPhone Address1 Address2 City State Zip Country Timezone PGPKey Creator Created LastUpdatedBy LastUpdated
2985 2985 46 ticket 0 0 3444 Richiesta entry CNAME per nuove licenze FEV 0 0 0 0 0 resolved 0 (null) 1970-01-01 00:00:00 2012-09-10 13:24:00 1970-01-01 00:00:00 2012-09-10 13:24:00 3444 2012-09-10 13:24:00 11821 2012-09-10 10:31:00 0 3444 john.doe ###### #####   (null) [email protected]     John Doe     (null) (null) (null) (null) (null) (null)                       (null) (null) 12 2012-03-07 11:04:54 12 2012-05-08 10:44:12
--------
Final RT training for 2012 in Atlanta, GA - October 23 & 24
  http://bestpractical.com/training

We're hiring! http://bestpractical.com/jobs

Reply via email to