Thank you, this is what I thought but needed to eliminate it as a potential issue.
-----Original Message----- From: David Lang <da...@lang.hm> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2024 5:36 PM To: Rory Toma via rsyslog <rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com> Cc: Rory Toma <rory.t...@ooma.com> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Question on legacy syntax vs action RainerScript CAUTION: This email is originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Rory Toma wrote: > However, we are missing some messages on the backed that get logged locally. > I'm trying to eliminate causes, and want to make sure of something. > Before, with legacy syntax, we'd use > > *.* > > Syntax so everything was logged. Is this the default or do I need to add > something to the action statement? That is the default, you don't need to use it (you still can use that format ahead of an action statement if you want, but *.* or a bare action of any format will do the same thing) David Lang _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
