In any case, if it is a bug, fixing it is hard for compatibility
reasons. The code has not been touched for a very long time.

https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/blame/master/runtime/conf.c#L356

Rainer

El jue, 3 nov 2022 a las 10:08, Rainer Gerhards
(<rgerha...@hq.adiscon.com>) escribió:
>
> maybe I have not fully understood the original question. Will try
> later today ;-)
>
> However, that part of the code that parses the selectors is actually
> still the same we inherited from syslogd ~20 years ago. Of course, I
> can't outrule we made some changes, but I honestly don't think so.
>
> Rainer
>
> El jue, 3 nov 2022 a las 9:23, Mariusz Kruk via rsyslog
> (<rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com>) escribió:
> >
> > I'm not saying that behaviour is wrong but I'd interpret the wording in
> > the docs as Gordon intended.
> >
> > https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v8-stable/configuration/filters.html
> >
> > "Multiple selectors may be specified for a single action using the
> > semicolon (“;’’) separator. Remember that each selector in the selector
> > field is capable to overwrite the preceding ones. Using this behavior
> > you can exclude some priorities from the pattern." (as a side note -
> > "capable" connects with "of *ing", so should be rather used as "capable
> > of overwriting" but that's not the point ;-)). I'd intepret that passage
> > as "if you add multiple selectors with semilcolons, the latter ones
> > overwrite the former" so I'd expect it to work as Gordon did. It might
> > need rewording if it works differently.
> >
> > MK
> >
> > On 2.11.2022 20:18, Rainer Gerhards via rsyslog wrote:
> > > Info is higher severity than debug, so it validly matches.
> > >
> > > Sent from phone, thus brief.
> > >
> > > David Lang via rsyslog <rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com> schrieb am Mi., 2. Nov.
> > > 2022, 20:10:
> > >
> > >> not that I expect this to fix it (this isn't something I've seen as a
> > >> known
> > >> bug), but could you please confirm that this still happens on the current
> > >> version of rsyslog?
> > >>
> > >> David Lang
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 2 Nov 2022, Gordon Marler (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) via rsyslog 
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 19:01:22 -0000
> > >>> From: "Gordon Marler (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) via rsyslog"
> > >>>      <rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com>
> > >>> Reply-To: Gordon Marler <gmar...@bloomberg.net>,
> > >>>      rsyslog-users <rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com>
> > >>> To: rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com
> > >>> Cc: "Gordon Marler (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)" <gmar...@bloomberg.net>
> > >>> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Reducing selector effect in RainerScript
> > >>>
> > >>> I've stripped down my config to just this rule, and tried with and
> > >> without the stop directive - after restarting rsyslogd, of course - no
> > >> change.
> > >>> Also happens on the rsyslogd versions delivered with Solaris 11.4, RHEL
> > >> 7.x and RHEL 8.x, which all hover around the 8.210x version
> > >>> From: rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com At: 11/02/22 03:45:01 UTC-4:00To:
> > >> rsyslog@lists.adiscon.com
> > >>> Cc:  k...@epsilon.eu.org
> > >>> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Reducing selector effect in RainerScript
> > >>>
> > >>> Generally, your config should work the way you indended. It's hard to
> > >>> say however if other entries in your config don't cause any side 
> > >>> effects.
> > >>>
> > >>> You could add a "stop" directive to make sure that events matching your
> > >>> selector won't be processed further. Like:
> > >>>
> > >>> *.debug;local6.err {
> > >>>     action( type="omfile" file="/what/ever/file")
> > >>>     stop
> > >>> }
> > >>>
> > >>> On 2.11.2022 01:26, Gordon Marler (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) via rsyslog
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>> I'm porting some configurations from syslog to rsyslog, and seeing some
> > >>> unexpected selector behavior in rsyslog 8.2104
> > >>>> After reading the selector examples from the configuration portion of
> > >> the
> > >>> rsyslog manual, I'm either misunderstanding how this is supposed to
> > >> work, or
> > >>> there's a long standing issue here.
> > >>>> So, the original selector looks like this:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *.debug;local6.err
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The intent is to log all facilities at debug or higher, except for
> > >> local6,
> > >>> which should only log at err or higher.  So I end up with a RainerScript
> > >> block
> > >>> like so:
> > >>>> *.debug;local6.err {
> > >>>>      action( type="omfile" file="/what/ever/file")
> > >>>> }
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But, I start to see messages at local6.info show up in the file,
> > >> surprisingly.
> > >>>> To get the desired end effect, I end up having to craft the selector
> > >> like so
> > >>> (which only works because only local6.info is chatty, nothing higher
> > >> than
> > >>> that), which surprises me:
> > >>>> *.debug;local6.err;local6.!=info
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So, am I simply doing this wrong/misunderstanding how selectors work,
> > >> or is
> > >>> there something odd going on?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> rsyslog mailing list
> > >>>> https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > >>>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > >>>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> > >>>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a
> > >> myriad of
> > >>> sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> > >> DON'T LIKE
> > >>> THAT.
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> rsyslog mailing list
> > >>> https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > >>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > >>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> > >>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> > >> of
> > >>> sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> > >> DON'T LIKE
> > >>> THAT.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> rsyslog mailing list
> > >>> https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > >>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > >>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> > >>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> > >> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> > >> DON'T LIKE THAT.
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> rsyslog mailing list
> > >> https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > >> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > >> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> > >> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> > >> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> > >> DON'T LIKE THAT.
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rsyslog mailing list
> > > https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> > > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad 
> > > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you 
> > > DON'T LIKE THAT.
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsyslog mailing list
> > https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
> > sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T 
> > LIKE THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to