Hello! I asked Reiner a while ago regarding this and he told me he is not going to remove this.. Though there is no decision on any new syntax for this.. I'd be happy with some "omfile" options to configure a size limit and number of archives to keep. That's more than enough for most of us I guess.. well.. maybe compression program as well.. and encryption... and upload to s3/azure blob store/hdfs/whatever else.. endless story I'd say :-D
I guess this is why it's in the current state. On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 at 14:40, Vivek Kumar via rsyslog < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am implementing a tracing mechanism and the outchannel features comes > handy to add Logrotate. > However, it is mentioned in the following link that it is a to-be removed > feature, at least as far as the config syntax is concerned. > > https://www.rsyslog.com/doc/v8-stable/compatibility/v6compatibility.html > > Could someone please comment is it planned for disabling or being > considered with a different syntax? > > Thanks, > Vivek > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. > -- Yury Bushmelev _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list https://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
