Am 25.05.20 um 00:42 schrieb Jorrit Jongma via rsync: > Testing showed the performance improvement to go up quickly going from > 64 to 512 bytes, with diminishing returns above, 4096 was where it > seemed to plateau for me. Re-used CHUNK_SIZE (32 kB) as it already > exists and should be fine to use here anyway. Will this not to produce more false negative results? This mean if comparing a block will produce "same cksum" although the blocks differs?
Cheers, Pierre -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
