On 2020-05-23 10:21:31 [-0700], Wayne Davison wrote: > > Adding optional support for openssl's crypto library is also a good idea.
I posted [0] openssl support with SHA1 support and asked whether openssl is possible. At that time added md5 and I think md4. I received no feedback bach then but if you want me to respin the openssl part (without sha1 now that we have xxhash) I can certainly do that. > I've also added a comment to the checksum.c file about my support of being > able to distribute a dynamically linked version of rsync that links with > the openssl and xxhash libraries (since they are both BSD 2-clause > licensed), especially since this should (IMO) be considered to be covered > under the System Libraries part of the GPL. also, openssl 3.0 will be apache-2 licensed. [0] https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2020-February/032062.html > ..wayne.. Sebastian -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
