Kevin Korb via rsync <rsync@lists.samba.org> (Mi 14 Mär 2018 15:25:56 CET): > Do not use --checksum. It has an extremely limited use case. Normally > it is much slower than simply re-copying everything. --checksum means > checksum every file on both ends (even files that only exist on one end) > before doing anything else even if doing so causes a timeout failure. > --checksum is the only part of rsync stupid enough to leave one end idle > potentially for hours.
They just use --partial --numeric-ids
and have the „feeling“ that the local i/o load stays low while the remote
side has high i/o.
I'll try to build a reproducer.
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
! key id 7CBF764A and 972EAC9F are revoked since 2015-01 ------------ -
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
