regarding dynamic slowdown, you may also have a look at:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7120

regards
Roland

List:       rsync
Subject:    Re: RFC: slow-down option
From:       Marian Marinov <mm () yuhu ! biz>
Date:       2014-04-03 12:52:53
Message-ID: 533D59A5.4080503 () yuhu ! biz
[Download message RAW]

On 04/03/2014 02:48 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Marian Marinov wrote...
> 
> > I've been using rsync on some backup servers for years. In 2011 we
> > had a situation where the FS of the backup server was behaving
> > strange, even thou there was enough available I/O, the fs(ext4 on
> > 16TB partition with a lot of inodes) was lagging. After much testing
> > we found that rsync was hammering the fs too hard.
> 
> I'd like to learn more about that scenario. Mostly, I'm curious
> whether these file transfers involved creation of a *lot* and probably
> rather small files.

The files were *mostly* small files under 10k. We had around 10 concurrent 
rsyncs \
running at any given time. The fs was build on top of RAID6 array. But 
unfortunately \
I did not create the journal on separate device and actually  did not left any 
space \
for separate device for the journal, which in my opinion would help in that \
situation.

When I did the patch, I was also thinking about a more dynamic slowdown, one 
that \
would take into account the size of  the file that was previously transmitted 
or the \
size of the file that will be transmitted.

Marian
> 
> Christoph
> 

-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Reply via email to