yes : disabling the timeout on the server side worked around the problem. anyway, ready to test additional patches if helpful.
best- Tom 2013/10/4 Wayne Davison <way...@samba.org> > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:26 AM, thomas veymont > <thomas.veym...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> patched the 3.1.0 io.c source , now I get this message on the client >> side: >> (...) >> unknown message 42:0 [sender] >> > > Aha, then the patch is unneeded. The sender must be in the very-early > file-list-sending code where it doesn't accept the full list of available > messages. I'll look into if we can get the receiving side to avoid such > early-in-the-transfer keep-alive sending, but in the meantime I'd suggest > that you either use 3.1.0 on the sending side, or disable the timeout. > > ..wayne.. >
-- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
