https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7778
way...@samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Comment #7 from way...@samba.org 2010-11-08 20:24 CST -------
This is caused by the repetition of the file's data. When rsync checks at
offset 1 in the receiving file for a matching block, it finds a match (because
all the blocks are identical after the first byte), and rsync never gets back
to the 1024-byte aligned blocks on the sender to notice that the data is
identical again. If your data was not so repetitive, rsync would quickly sync
up and skip the rest of the writes. (You can see what it is doing via either
the 3.1.0dev option --debug=deltasum3 or via -vvvv.)
I'm not sure how best the code could be improved to try to avoid this. Matt's
idea of block-aligned checks could be made to work (given enough read-ahead),
but I'm not sure it's worth it, since it only affects very repetitive files.
I do note that the code that is looking for a (preferential) identical-position
block is wasting time when the receiving side block is not aligned with the
sending-side's blocks. That is something that should be optimized.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
