The timeout value actually gets doubled in 3.1 (didn't check in 3.0). It first happens between sender and destination, producing an error message. However in the destination one of the processes continues to run, and only times out and exits after another timeout interval. So in practice all processes terminate only after twice the period.
Is this intentional? Is it unavoidable? -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
