JW wrote: > On Monday 13 July 2009 14:18:38 Ryan Malayter wrote: > > It would be a big boost for large files if rsync "remembered" the > > hashes on each end, so it didn't have to re-read the files on every > > run if the files were unchanged. This is a feature that rsync's > > developers have rejected, since rsync is designed to be stateless > > between runs. I believe Unison does keep state at both ends, you might > > want to look at that. > > Perhaps someone should create an rsync-stateful version? Or maybe a > --stateful option could be added to the existing rsync. > > Seems like a lot of people request this option.
Why don't they just use Unison? -- Jamie -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
