hello, with --stats, shouldn`t we differ between "number of files transferred" and "number of files failed" ?
the problem is, that i have files which ALWAYS fail on transfer, and to check for "number of files failed"<=2 would be the best way for me to check if the overall transfer was ok. if i magaged to create a patch to adress this, would such patch be accepted ? regards roland rsync --stats -av * /tmp/test2 sending incremental file list rsync: send_files failed to open "/tmp/rsync-3.0.6/patches/openssl-support.diff": Permission denied (13) Number of files: 44 Number of files transferred: 1 Total file size: 590000 bytes Total transferred file size: 27793 bytes Literal data: 0 bytes Matched data: 0 bytes File list size: 1094 File list generation time: 0.001 seconds File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds Total bytes sent: 1111 Total bytes received: 31 sent 1111 bytes received 31 bytes 2284.00 bytes/sec total size is 590000 speedup is 516.64 rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1040) [sender=3.0.4] i would expect: Number of files: 44 Number of files transferred: 0 Number of files failed: 1 Total file size: 590000 bytes ... ________________________________________________________________ Neu: WEB.DE Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://produkte.web.de/go/02/ -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
