Andrew Gideon wrote: > It may be clear to others, but I'm missing what you mean by this. I > gather that rsh yielded poor results. What did you do for > "simple data copy tests" that did well?
Sorry for being unclear: # ttcp -s -l 819200 -t xbackX ttcp-t: buflen=819200, nbuf=2048, align=16384/0, port=5001 tcp -> xbackX ttcp-t: socket ttcp-t: connect ttcp-t: 1677721600 bytes in 17.16 real seconds = 95494.23 KB/sec +++ ttcp-t: 2048 I/O calls, msec/call = 8.58, calls/sec = 119.37 ttcp-t: 0.0user 2.2sys 0:17real 13% 0i+0d 0maxrss 0+200pf 1115+30csw Ethtool reports full duplex at 1000Mb/s on both systems as well. Would latency be an issue? Does rsync operate on a file-by-file basis over the network or does it batch up requests? Jeremy -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
