That decision obviously depends on processing power and network capacity available. A recent thread on Slashdot (http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/12/14/162235.shtml) mentioned this research which might give more insight: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dga/papers/dsync-usenix2008-abstract.html
And btw, I though rsync used MD4, not MD5. Jeroen van der Vegt System designer ________________________________ Ok, i will check the two links, thanks! "Version 30 of the protocol (released with rsync version 3.0.0) now uses MD5 hashes rather than MD4." http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.0-NEWS David ____________________________________________________________________ Psssst! Schon vom neuen WEB.DE MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.produkte.web.de/messenger/?did=3123 -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
