On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 01:09:20PM -0800, David Rothenberger wrote: > Does this patch (or a modified version that conforms to POSIX) stand a > chance of being accepted?
There's a problem with including this in the mainstream version: if we don't turn //some/path into /some/path, it won't match a daemon-config exclusion of "/some/path". So, this would need to be conditionally compiled into the code so that it only affects systems that treat a leading "//" as a different path from a leading "/". ..wayne.. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
