On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:47:53PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> reordering the args in the ifs so that an underflow can't trigger a
> spurious successful test.
Actually, my change isn't good enough, since an underflow with the "if"
vars reordered should actually indicate a match. So, my patch would
need another compare to test for underflow. Your patch also needs an
extra compare in the file1 >= file2 case:
if (file1 - file2 <= modify_window && file1 - file2 >= 0)
I guess I'll think about this more later.
..wayne..
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
