Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
I've upgraded from rsync 2.6.9 to 3.0.3 on both ends, but memory usage
is still too high.
Why should rsync 3's memory usage depend on the number of files? Does it
keep files it already knows should not be transferred in memory?
If not, then maybe we should hold back rsync's very useful, very speed
productive, read ahead of the file list. If we see that the "todo list"
piles up, maybe we should hold of the continued scan until the back log
gets smaller.
Yes, I know, it's the typical someone sitting on the fence, hardly ever
doing anything useful for the project, and dispensing "invaluable"
advice. Fact is, I need this. If Wayne doesn't do it, I will get around
to it eventually. The problem is that the key word here is "eventually".
Shachar
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
