Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:58:34PM +0200, Michal Soltys wrote:
have per-dir filter files being updated, its works the same as
--delete-after (if we disregard certain backup-file cases where the
suffix is not excluded), just more optimally.
You mean - the difference will be in the moment where the non-excluded
files get deleted ? As long as per-driectory filters are the same on
sender and receiver, the final outcome will still be the same regardless
of a delete algorithm used ?
Anyway - would it be allright to submit a small manpage diff, to add
some details about difference between delete-delay and delete-after ?
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
