I didn't read all of your post, to be honest, so forgive me if this does
not help, but are you aware of rsnapshot <http://www.rsnapshot.org/> ?
It is very nice for snapshots and uses rsync 'behind the scenes'.
Search the list archives for info on this. In particular, this post
<http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2007-December/019470.html> comes
to my mind which deals with a situation similar to yours (if I haven't
misread your description): rsync daemon on server, no changes on
clients,
clients "push" backups to server, server handles snapshots.
-Moritz
Am 20.04.2008 um 19:02 schrieb Carl E. Thompson:
Hello,
This is my first post to the list.
Is it possible to specify the --link-dest option server-side in
the
rsyncd.conf file? What I'd like to do is implement incremental
snapshot
backups without having to change the clients which all just do regular
dumps to the rsync server. I'd like to specifiy this option on the
server rather than on the client because I don't want to have to
change
all of the clients and don't want to trust that all of the clients are
configured correctly. So in essence I'd like the clients to think
they're doing a regular backup to a "write-only" module in whatever
way
they see fit but I'll have script magic on the server that makes it an
incremental snapshot. I can accomplish this imperfectly by using
the "cp
-al" hard link method but this is vulnerable to permission / owner /
group problems that could easily compromise all of the snapshots. It
seems to me the easiest way to do this would be if it were possible to
specify the "--link-dest" option on the server side in the module
configuration in the rsyncd.conf file. This would either override the
option if specified on the client or error out.
Alternatively and best of all I could accomplish the same thing
with
the "cp -al" method if there were an option to tell the server that
permission / owner / group / other changes are never to be performed
directly on an existing file but that a new file is always created via
local copy and moved into place (such an option would of course
conflict
with options like "--inplace"). This would be a valuable option to
have
because it could help guarantee for a paranoid administrator that
previously backed up and hard linked files won't be modified by
rsync in
case of a configuration error or malicious client.
If there is no way to do either of these things with current
versions of rsync how would I go about requesting this feature for a
subsequent version?
Thank you very much,
Carl Thompson
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing
list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/
listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-
questions.html
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
