On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 07:06 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:44:47PM -0500, Ming Zhang wrote: > > from the mode, it looks that both of them are directories, so S_ISDIR() > > should be 1 and thus "dir_cnt--" should get executed, but later show > > dir_cnt is still 1. > > I wonder if dir_cnt was 3 when there was only 2 dir entries? I see a > way in the code that the dir_count global could get executed and then > later in the make_file() call it could return a NULL indicating that the > current entry should not get included.
i did not realize that there is a dir_cnt global defined. i need to figure out how to examine its value in gdb to confirm it was 3... gdb "cheat" me that showing the function parameter dir_cnt is 1, it can only grab the latest value which is 1 NOW. > > I'm moving the incrementing of the dir_count variable to avoid this. > If you would, please test the latest dev version (from the most recent > nightly tar file or the git repo). sure i will test and let you know, but since i did not hit it every time, i am not sure if i can reproduce. so no news will be good news... > > Thanks for your very detailed bug report! thanks. developer know developer's pain when facing an incomplete bug report. ;) > > ..wayne.. -- Ming Zhang @#$%^ purging memory... (*!% http://blackmagic02881.wordpress.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/blackmagic02881 -------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
