On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:45:27AM +0200, Julian Pace Ross wrote: > It seems not, and I must say that the bad behaviour as described by Matt's > reply the other day, persisted even after solely applying the > clientserver.c patch you had posted.
I don't see any such problem after that patch. You might try using the latest nightly tar file (which has this already fixed, but in a slightly different way from the patch I posted). ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
