https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491
------- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-08 02:22 MST ------- I like this idea. I, too, have seen degradation in response times when rsync starts on a large hierarchy. Using nice didn't help (much). Wouldn't it be better to count up readdir() calls and then sleep for a longer time when a threshold is reached? Fewer system calls that way. For example, add the slow-down value to a counter and when the counter passes 100,000 then sleep for 100,000 microseconds (0.1 second) and subtract 100,000 from the counter. BTW, in your example, did you mean --slow-down=1000 (not 100) for 1000 microsecs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
