On Thu 28 Apr 2005, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:10:52PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > > Would a patch for --min-size be acceptable? > > Firstly, thanks for the patch -- I've tweaked it a bit and checked it
I just saw that my patch for the manpage copied the example from --max-size a bit too literally...: +may be a fractional value (e.g. "bf(--max-size=1.5m)"). That should probably be something like: +may be a fractional value (e.g. "bf(--min-size=2.5k)"). Additionally, the --max-size description could now simply refer to the --min-size text for explanation of the SIZE value, something like: dit(bf(--max-size=SIZE)) This tells rsync to avoid transferring any file that is larger than the specified SIZE. See bf(--min-size) above for the description of SIZE. Paul Slootman -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
