Thanks!
At 5:44 PM -0700 4/23/05, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 06:46:23PM -0500, Raphael Jaffey wrote:Should this be OK or is the most recent "bleeding edge" more stable?
The CVS version is more stable than 2.6.4 because it's almost entirely composed of bug fixes (I'm working toward a bug-fix release in the not- too-distant future). I wouldn't recommend 2.5.7 -- too many bug fixes have gone into rsync since then, so I personally wouldn't use anything older than 2.6.3 (which is about 7 months old now). I use the latest CVS version on all my systems (which identifies itself as "2.6.5cvs").
FYI, the latest "nightly" tar file now has all CVS bug fixes in it, so if you want an easier way to fetch the latest and greatest, you won't need to apply any patches to that.
..wayne..
-- ___________________________________________________________________________ Raphael Jaffey E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager of Network Services The Art Institute of Chicago Voice: (312) 629-6543 111 S. Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL 60603 FAX: (312) 641-3406 -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
