On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:36:59PM -0800, Steve Bonds wrote: > Despite HP's intransigence, I'd like to have an rsync that builds out > of the box with working large file support.
I attempted a fix for this by having the code not use mkstemp() if open64() was around but mkstemp64() was not. However, not having any HP systems around to test this on, I never heard if this was helpful or not. Apparently not. I'd prefer to add rules to configure that don't require trying to write a large sparse file or to use the O_LARGEFILE kluge, but I'm open to suggestions on whether creating a 64-bit binary is better than just disabling HAVE_SECURE_MKSTEMP for HP-UX. I think the latter would probably be good enough, if we just want to go that route. What's the best way to detect HP-UX, anyway? ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
