[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'll leave this open for now as a suggestion for a more extensive rename > detector.
Is there some philosophical or practical reason why rsync cannot use some persistent external database to map remote inodes to local inodes? Having that information persist would make such a detector relatively straightforward, I believe. - Andrew -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
