On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:28:43 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > Comments? How do people feel about making the --delete-during behavior > the default --delete algorithm? I think it will be much more efficient > (and less prone to timeouts), so having it as the default is the best > choice.
This sounds quite helpful. How does this behave in the event of a read error on the source? The desired behavior from my standpoint would be to disable deletion of files in the current directory, but continue deleting files in other directories. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
