https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2130
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-14 12:01 ------- Created an attachment (id=843) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=843&action=view) My version of the patch to progress.c I'm considering this change, and I think it looks good with a couple changes to the progress.c part of the patch: - Make use of the HAVE_GETPGRP define. - Don't skip the output if tcgetpgrp() returns -1 (as it will if output is redirected to a file). Is it safe to assume that if a system has getpgrp() that it also has tcgetpgrp()? That's what both our patches are currently doing, and it seems reasonable to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
