On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:47:03PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: > If I then run it again, I get the following [a different hashed file]
I didn't see that in my just-run test. I did notice a problem with the code not removing an existing destination file prior to trying to hard link a hashed file into place (when the hashed file already exists). I checked in a fix for this, along with the missing close() you found. > It forces the checksum-seed to 12345, although I can't see why. Good point. I guess the thought at the time was that it was using the actual rsync checksum, but since it is not, it doesn't need to force the checksum_seed to a static value. I've removed that code. I haven't ever tried to make use of this patch, so feel free to let me know if there are other problems with the code. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
