https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1646
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-07 15:23 -------
Yes, this combination of options did not work at all right (rsync updated the
file inplace and then moved the file into the backup dir -- ouch!).
I've checked in a file that has the generator copy a backup during the checksum
generation phase when --inplace was specified with --backup. Then, the code was
further improved to use the backup file as the basis file so that the normal
--inplace limits on skipping overwritten blocks was not needed. This, as you
noted, makes the transfer as efficient as if --inplace was not used.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
