Hi, On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:48:31PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote: > > So, my question (indeed more, a wish): wouldn't it be possible to start > > bulding both databases in parallel, or shortly after each other? > > That would be possible, yes, but it might be tricky to get it efficient > (since you would either need to poll the socket data while scanning the > directories or to use a separate thread). Later, there are two separate threads anyways. > This double scan only occurs when the --delete option is used, so one > change you can try is to switch over to using --delete-after. This > ensures that the transfer completes before the receiving side starts its > directory-deletion scanning, making the timeout less disruptive. If > this works for you and if you have a hard time getting your users to > change their habits, you could even install a custom rsync that would > interpret --delete as --delete-after. I will try that. Cheers -e -- Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
