> The backtrace you cite looks to be impossible (nested calls to
> send_file_list() can't happen), so I assume that the list 
> is not valid
> for some reason.  I haven't seen such a hang as you 
> describe.  Have you
> delved into this any further?

Well what I did after my last post was recompiling rsync with different optimisation 
options,
and also with all the optimisations disabled (-O0).
the directory tree that is being synchronised is a so-called gentoo linux's 'portage', 
consisting
of lots of directories (~14k) and files (~68k), most of which are pretty small (<5k)

whats further interesting, that after todays update of the tree from the upstream 
server,
all of the sudden i can not reproduce described behaviour anymore...

is it possible that it was something in the tree causing rsync to act so weird ?

regards,
terry



--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Reply via email to