Hi Dmitry, I've not had time to test it under SFU 3.5 - job for next week !
I tried to compile rsync under SFU 3.5 .. and got into a world of pain with header files... http://www.interopsystems.com/tools/forum/tm.asp?m=708&p=1&tmode=1&smode =1&cookieCheck=349585534
But then Rodney at Interop systems did it for me.. http://www.interopsystems.com/tools/warehouse.htm ftp://ftp.interopsystems.com/pkgs/3.5/rsync-2.6.0-bin.tgz
Although it's nice to have a static binary of rsync, having been reading the rsync mailing list the last few weeks now, it would seem that it would be better to compile rsync from source as it develops. I had no idea it was so actively under development !
So, could you please detail the steps you took to sucessfully compile
rsync under SFU 3.5 ??
I compiled 2.6.0 as usual- ./confugure make
Only problem, I found- it doesn't work with paths correctly-
i.e. it says that it can't find files if I start it not from shell :-(
From shell all works OK.
I'm newbie in SFU (installed it yesterday) , so could you tell me how can I run rsync directly from
windows command prompt?
btw, is there any speed improvements over cygwin ? I don't undrestand yet...
Cheers, Darren.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dmitry Melekhov Sent: Wednesday, 11 February 2004 11:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SFU?
Hello!
I just compiled rsync 2.6.0 on SFU 3.5 and it works :-) Did somebody test it for real work?
Thank you!
-- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
