On Wed 28 Jan 2004, jw schultz wrote: > > Situations where blah.0 gets renamed to blah.1 seldom > benefit from rename detection anyway because the cascading > renames just make room for new files reusing the old names. > Short of prioritizing file checksums ahead of names for > finding unchanged files that is simply not going to be > doable. Rsync is only one reason why cascading renames are > less than desireable. Much better to use names with greater > semantic content that remain fixed for the life of the > object.
Yeah, I must find time to patch logrotate so that it can use a YYYYMMDD extension instead of the 0, 1, 2, ... . That would help :-) Paul Slootman -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
